Whatsapp 93125-11015 For Details
The
Supreme Court on July 26 orally asked the Centre to find out from the Finance
Commission whether there is a way to curb political parties from promising and
distributing "irrational freebies" during election campaigns.
A Bench
led by Chief Justice of India N. V. Ramana flagged the issue as
"serious" and asked for means to control the promise of
"freebies" to entice votes.
The court
did not receive a clear-cut answer from Additional Solicitor General K. M.
Nataraj on the Centre's position. The Election Commission of India (ECI), on
the other hand, chose a hands-off approach, as was evident from their affidavit
which said "whether such policies are financially viable or its adverse
effect on the economic health of the State is a question that has to be
considered and decided by the voters of the State.
The senior
lawyer came forward and said freebies was a "serious issue" and had
to be tackled at the level of the States. He said it would be unfair to put the
liability on the Centre. He suggested tapping into the expertise of the Finance
Commission.
The
Finance Commission is an independent body. The Commission, while making
allocations to the States, can take into account the debts of each individual
States and examine whether offers of freebies would be viable for them.
The Bench
promptly turned Mr. Nataraj and asked him to explore this avenue and get
instructions from the government. The hearing came on a writ petition filed by
BJP leader and lawyer, Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, who had argued that the offer
and distribution of "irrational freebies" amounted to bribery and
unduly influencing voters. It vitiated free and fair elections in the country.
Mr.
Upadhyay claimed that States in total had debts of over ₹70 lakh crore. He
suggested that the Law Commission of India should be asked to examine the
statutes to control the giving away of unreasonable freebies.
States
Karnataka
HC notice to Centre on Twitter plea challenging ‘blocking’ (Page no. 4)
(GS
Paper 3, Internal Security)
The High
Court of Karnataka ordered issue of notice to the Central Government on a petition
filed by micro-blogging platform Twitter challenging the legality of a
series of ‘blocking orders’ issued by authorities under provisions of the
Information Technology Act, 2000, either to block Twitter accounts or
identified content of the accounts.
On July
26, the petition came up for hearing before a bench of Justice Krishna S.
Dixit, who adjourned further hearing till August 25 while allowing Twitter to
submit, in a sealed cover, copies of the ‘blocking orders’, which are treated
as confidential documents as per the law.
The
designated officer of the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology
(MeitY) had issued several ‘blocking orders’ since February 2021 asking Twitter
to block tweets or accounts.
Senior
Advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for Twitter, has said that the blocking
orders are contrary to the right to freedom of expression and the entire
business of the company will come to an end due to the nature of a blocking
order.
The
counsel for the Central Government said that the Solicitor General of India,
who will argue on behalf of the government, is infected with COVID-19, and he
requires at least 15 days to recover from the infection.
Hence, the
bench adjourned the hearing while accepting August 25 as the date for hearing
the petition, on Mr. Rohatgi’s request.
The
petition was filed after the designated officer of the MeitY, following a
series of meeting with the Compliance Officer of Twitter on the issues raised
on correctness of several ‘blocking orders’, issued a notice on June 27, 2022
informing that penal action would be initiated against Twitter for not
complying with the ‘blocking orders’.
Twitter,
which has complied with the ‘blocking orders’ under protest, has contended in
the petition that the ‘blocking orders’ are manifestly arbitrary, procedurally
and substantially not in consonance with Section 69A of the IT Act, 2000.
The
‘blocking orders’ are also contrary to the procedures and safeguards prescribed
in the Information Technology (Procedures and Safeguards for Blocking of Access
to Information by Public) Rules, 2009, the petitioner claims.
Rare
flight of Antarctic’s Light-mantled Albatross to T.N. coast intrigues
researchers (Page no. 4)
(GS
Paper 3, Environment)
Rameswaram
and adjoining islets of the Gulf of Mannar Marine National Park on the Adam’s
Bridge (Ram Setu) are known for their unique marine ecosystem.
But the
region grabbed the attention of international researchers as Asia’s first
sighting of Light-mantled Albatross (Phoebetria palpebrate),
a species native to the Antarctic seas, was recorded here.
The
sighting, ‘First Asian record of Light-mantled Albatross Phoebetria
palpebrata (Foster, 1785) from Rameswaram Island, Tamil Nadu, India’,
has been published in the Journal of Threatened Taxa, and
researchers are looking for more insights into what is regarded as a surprising
transcontinental tour of the Antarctic seabird.
The record
from the Palk Bay side of Rameswaram island is significant, and it throws up
new challenges to researchers once these Antarctic birds migrate to Asia.
This
finding also directs researchers to look for bird migration away from the
well-known and established routes and sites. The location where the Albatross
was spotted is part of the Palk Bay and near the Gulf of Mannar, an ‘Important
Bird Area’ on India’s southeast coast, he adds.
It was an
unexpected sighting and we initially believed it to be a Slender-billed Gull.
We didn’t think then that this would be the first sighting of the bird in Asia.
As the
nearest recorded site of the bird is around 5,000 km away from Rameswaram, the
researchers feel a change in atmospheric pressure could have been among the
reasons for the Albatross to land on an Indian shore.
Of late,
changes in the wind pattern triggered by global warming are bringing strange
birds to our region. A lot of changes are happening in the wind pattern owing
to the increase in atmospheric temperature.
Birds like
albatross, that are known to be on the move, use the wind and save their energy
during flights. Even slight changes in the temperature can cause drastic
changes in the wind pattern and birds could land in far-away places that are
not familiar to them.
Editorial
Whose GDP is it anyway? (Page no. 6)
(GS
Paper 3, Economy)
In a few
weeks, a quarterly ritual will play out in India. The Government will release
the first quarter’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth numbers with some
chest-thumping about how India is among the fastest-growing economies in the
world.
Opposition
parties will hold press conferences on the same day to counter such bombast
with facts, rhetoric and nitpicking.
But the
real question is: what is the significance and impact of GDP growth for the
common person? The answer: very little.
It is safe
to say that the average person’s primary and perhaps sole concern about the
economy is the income they can earn.
It is well
documented that for several years, the single most important demand of people
in India is jobs, specifically, a high-quality formal sector job that ensures
dignity of work, good income and job security.
It is then apparent that GDP growth matters to
the average Indian only if it can generate good quality jobs and incomes for
them.
Using data
of ‘employment in public and organised private sectors’ published by the
Reserve Bank of India (RBI), we can calculate that in the decade between 1980
and 1990, every one percentage point of GDP growth (nominal) generated roughly
two lakh new jobs in the formal sector.
That is,
if India’s GDP grew by 14% every year in the 1980s, it can be said that it
created roughly 28 lakh new formal jobs.
In the
subsequent decade from 1990 to 2000, every one percentage point of GDP growth
yielded roughly one lakh new formal sector jobs, half of the previous decade.
In the
next decade between 2000 and 2010, one percentage point of GDP growth generated
only 52,000 new jobs. The RBI stopped publishing this data from 2011-12, but
one can safely infer using proxy data that in the 2010-2020 decade, the number
of new jobs generated for every percentage of GDP growth fell even further.
OPED
A path
to global connectivity (Page no. 7)
(GS
Paper 3, Science and Technology)
As
terrestrial 5G mobile networks are being rolled out across countries, there is
a renewed interest in integrating Non-Terrestrial Networks, the primary one
being the low latency Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite networks (SatNets), as a
complement to terrestrial networks.
Towards
this, Starlink, operated by the Elon Musk-owned SpaceX, and OneWeb,
promoted by Bharti Global, have launched about 2,500 and 648 LEO satellites
respectively at an altitude of about 1,200 km with the objective of promoting
global broadband connectivity.
There are
other players such as Reliance Jio in a joint venture with Luxembourg-based SES
and Amazon’s Project Kuiper.
There are
primarily three main use cases for integrating LEO SatNets with terrestrial 5G
networks: (i) service continuity to provide seamless transition between
terrestrial networks and SatNets in case of public safety, disaster
management and emergency situations; (ii) service ubiquity to provide 5G services
in unserved and underserved areas of the world, thereby bridging the digital
divide; (iii) service scalability that utilises the unique capabilities of
SatNets in multicasting and broadcasting similar content over a large
geographical area. The LEO SatNets can provide service not only to stationary
but also to in-motion users.
Satellites
and terrestrial networks have always been considered two independent
ecosystems, and their standardisation efforts have proceeded independent of
each other.
In view of
the above advantages, standard-setting organisations such as the Third
Generation Partnership project (3GPP), comprising telcos and equipment
manufacturers around the world, started integrating SatNets in the
standardisation process.
As an
extension to terrestrial networks, satellites were first mentioned in a
deployment scenario of 5G in 3GPP Release 14. This was to provide 5G
communication services for areas where terrestrial coverage was not available
and also to support services that could be accessed more efficiently through
satellite systems, such as broadcasting services and delay-tolerant services.
Interestingly,
wireless communications through LEO satellites over long distances is proven to
be 1.47 times faster than communication over the same distance through
terrestrial optic fibre.
It is this
advantage along with global coverage that provide a strong use case for LEO
SatNets to complement terrestrial optic fibre networks.
News
19
Rajya Sabha members suspended in one go (Page no. 11)
(GS
Paper 2, Polity and Governance)
Nineteen
Members of Parliament (MPs) were on Tuesday suspended from attending Rajya
Sabha session for the remainder of the week for disrupting the House
proceedings and demanding a discussion on price rise and a rollback of the Goods
and Services Tax (GST) on daily essentials.
The
suspended MPs are seven from Trinamool Congress (TMC), six from Dravida
Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), three from Telangana Rashtra Samiti (TRS) and two from
Communist Party of India (Marxist) and one from Communist Party of India
(CPI).
Later, the
House was adjourned for the day as the Chair appealed the suspended MPs to
withdraw from the House, but they continued to remain in the well of the House.
This is
the highest number of single batch suspension and follows the suspension
of four Congress MPs in Lok Sabha on Monday for the rest of the
monsoon session.
In
November last year, 12 MPs from Opposition parties were suspended for the
entire winter session in Rajya Sabha.
Sushmita
Dev, Mausam Noor, Shanta Chhetri, Dola Sen, Santanu Sen, Abir Ranjan Biswas and
Nadiumal Haque of the TMC were suspended.
DMK’s M
Mohamed Abdulla, Kanimozhi NVN Somu, M Shanmugam, S Kalyanasundaram, R
Girirajan and N R Elango were also suspended. B Lingaiah Yadav, Ravichandra
Vaddiraju and Damodar Rao Divakonda (TRS), V Sivadasan and A A Rahim (CPI-M)
and Sandosh Kumar (CPI) were the other leaders.
Minister
of State (MoS) for Parliamentary Affairs V. Muraleedharan moved a motion to
suspend 10 MPs in the Rajya Sabha. When it was adopted by a voice vote, Deputy
Chairman Harivansh Narayan Singh read out the names of 19 members who have been
suspended for the rest of the week.
In the
morning, the Upper House paid tributes to the soldiers killed during the Kargil
war. As soon as papers were laid on the table of the House, Opposition MPs
stormed to the Well of the House demanding a rollback of the GST on certain
essential goods. Rajya Sabha Chairman M. Venkaiah Naidu, without even taking up
the notices before him, adjourned the House till 12 p.m.
India
adds five more Ramsar sites (Page no. 12)
(GS
Paper 3, Environment)
India has
added five more Ramsar sites, or wetlands that are of international importance,
bringing the number of such sites to 54, Environment Minister Bhupendra Yadav. Delighted
to inform that 5 more Indian wetlands have got Ramsar recognition as wetlands
of international importance.
These are
the Karikili Bird Sanctuary, Pallikaranai Marsh Reserve Forest and Pichavaram
Mangrove in Tamil Nadu, the Sakhya Sagar in Madhya Pradesh and Pala Wetland in
Mizoram.
India’s
Ramsar wetlands are spread over 11,000 sq km — around 10% of the total wetland
area in the country — across 18 States.
No other
South Asian country has as many sites though this has much to do with India’s geographical
breadth and tropical diversity. The United Kingdom (175) and Mexico (142) —
smaller countries than India — have the maximum Ramsar sites whereas Bolivia
spans the largest area with 148,000 sq km under the Convention protection.
Being
designated a Ramsar site does not necessarily invite extra international funds
but that States — and the Centre — must ensure that these tracts of land are
conserved and spared from man-made encroachment.
Acquiring
this label also helps with a locale’s tourism potential and its international
visibility. Until 1981, India had 41 Ramsar sites though the last decade has
seen the sharpest rise —13 — in designating new sites.
Wetlands,
according to the Environment Ministry, are an “area of marsh, fen, peatland or
water; whether natural or artificial, permanent or temporary, with water that
is static or flowing, fresh, brackish or salt, including areas of marine water
the depth of which at low tide does not exceed six metres, but does not include
river channels, paddy fields, human-made water bodies/ tanks specifically
constructed for drinking water purposes and structures specifically constructed
for aquaculture, salt production, recreation and irrigation purposes.
To be
Ramsar site, however, it must meet at least one of nine criteria as defined by
the Ramsar Convention of 1961, such as supporting vulnerable, endangered, or
critically endangered species or threatened ecological communities or, if it
regularly supports 20,000 or more waterbirds or, is an important source of food
for fishes, spawning ground, nursery and/or migration path on which fish stocks
are dependent upon.
Third
parties joining CPEC is inherently illegal: India (Page no. 12)
(GS
Paper 2, International Relations)
Days after
China and Pakistan held a meeting to bring other countries into the
China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), India said that efforts to broaden
CPEC's scope are "inherently illegal".
"We
have seen reports on encouraging a proposed participation of third countries in
so called CPEC projects. Any such actions by any party directly infringe on
India's sovereignty and territorial integrity.
India
firmly and consistently opposes projects in the so-called CPEC, which are in
Indian territory that has been illegally occupied by Pakistan.
The Joint
Working Group of International Cooperation and Coordination under CPEC met on
July 21, when the Pakistani and Chinese officials discussed bringing in a third
county into the fold.
CPEC
consists of a number of infrastructure projects that are under construction
across Pakistan and is aimed at connecting China overland with the Gulf
countries by cutting through the Himalayan range in Gilgit Baltistan and the
Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. Soon after coming to power in Afghanistan last year,
the Taliban leadership had expressed desire to join the infrastructure project.
Mr. Bagchi
reminded Taliban and similar potential third parties of the problems associated
with the CPEC, saying, "Such activities are inherently illegal,
illegitimate and unacceptable, and will be treated accordingly by India."
The
Chinese activities in the PoK and Gilgit Baltistan, too, have been in focus
because of the upcoming G20 summit in 2023, which will be celebrated by India
through a series of events across the country.
Officials here
have not yet clarified if some of these events would be held in Jammu and
Kashmir. Chinese State media had earlier this month joined Pakistan in opposing
India hosting G20-related events in Kashmir.
Mr.
Bagchi's comment on Tuesday is part of a series of similar remarks from India
in the past few days, highlighting the importance of PoK in the Indian scheme
of things.
Defence
Minister Rajnath Singh referred to the Sharda temple in PoK on Sunday and said
the region is an "integral" part of India.
Business
IMF
cuts outlook for global growth, flags recession risk (Page no. 14)
(GS
Paper 2, International Relations)
The
International Monetary Fund cut global growth forecasts again on July 26,
warning that downside risks from high inflation and the Ukraine war were
materializing and could push the world economy to the brink of recession if
left unchecked.
Global
real GDP growth will slow to 3.2% in 2022 from a forecast of 3.6% issued in
April, the IMF said in an update of its World Economic Outlook. It added that
world GDP actually contracted in the second quarter due to downturns in China
and Russia.
The Fund
cut its 2023 growth forecast to 2.9% from the April estimate of 3.6%, citing
the impact of tighter monetary policy.
World
growth had rebounded in 2021 to 6.1% after the COVID-19 pandemic crushed global
output in 2020 with a 3.1% contraction.
The Fund
said its latest forecasts were "extraordinarily uncertain" and
subject to downside risks from Russia's war in Ukraine spiking energy and food
prices higher.
This would
exacerbate inflation and embed longer-term inflationary expectations that would
prompt further monetary policy tightening.
Under a
"plausible" alternative scenario that includes a complete cut-off of
Russian gas supplies to Europe by year-end and a further 30% drop in Russian
oil exports, the IMF said global growth would slow to 2.6% in 2022 and 2% in
2023, with growth virtually zero in Europe and the United States next year.
Global
growth has fallen below 2% only five times since 1970, the IMF said, including
the 2020 COVID-19 recession.
The IMF
said it now expects the 2022 inflation rate in advanced economies to reach
6.6%, up from 5.7% in the April forecasts, adding that it would remain elevated
for longer than previously anticipated. Inflation in emerging market and
developing countries is now expected to reach 9.5% in 2022, up from 8.7% in
April.