Whatsapp 93125-11015 For Details

Daily Current Affairs for UPSC Exam

9Nov
2024

Australia to Ban Social Media for Children Under 16 (GS Paper 1, Social Justice)

Australia to Ban Social Media for Children Under 16 (GS Paper 1, Social Justice)

In News:

  • The Australian government has proposed new legislation that will restrict access to social media platforms for children under the age of 16.
  • This move is aimed at addressing the growing concerns about the harmful effects of social media on young users.
  • The proposed restrictions are expected to have significant implications for both the social media landscape and the mental well-being of children across Australia.

 

Harmful Effects of Social Media on Children

Social media, while offering many benefits such as connectivity and access to information, has been associated with a range of negative effects, especially for children and adolescents. Some of the key concerns include:

  • Mental Health Issues: Increased use of social media is linked to higher rates of anxiety, depression, and cyberbullying. Children are particularly vulnerable to online harassment and the pressures of social comparison.
  • Sleep Disturbance: Excessive screen time, especially before bed, disrupts sleep patterns. This can lead to poor sleep quality, which, in turn, affects mood, cognitive function, and academic performance.
  • Academic Impact: Time spent on social media can reduce focus and productivity, leading to procrastination and declining academic performance.
  • Social Skills Decline: Prolonged use of social media reduces face-to-face interaction, which is crucial for developing communication and social skills.
  • Body Image Issues: Platforms like Instagram, which often emphasize visual aesthetics, can lead to body dissatisfaction, low self-esteem, and unrealistic beauty standards.
  • Privacy Risks: Children may not fully understand the privacy implications of sharing personal data online, making them vulnerable to identity theft, data breaches, and exposure to inappropriate content.
  • Materialism and Unrealistic Lifestyles: Influencer culture on social media can promote materialism and foster a sense of inadequacy as children compare themselves to curated, often unrealistic, portrayals of wealth and success.

 

Social Media Regulation in India

In India, the regulation of social media is governed by a set of guidelines and laws that aim to balance the interests of users, the government, and digital platforms. Some key regulatory measures include:

Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021:

    • Grievance Redressal Mechanism: A three-level grievance redressal system is in place to allow users to report issues and receive responses from platforms within a specific time frame.
    • Disclosure of Origin: Social media platforms are required to reveal the first originator of harmful or controversial messages when requested by a court or authorized agency.
    • Chief Compliance Officer: Platforms must appoint a Chief Compliance Officer (CCO) to ensure adherence to local laws.
    • Voluntary Account Verification: Social media platforms are encouraged to offer voluntary verification for users to ensure authenticity and reduce misinformation.

Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDPA) 2023:

    • Children’s Data Protection: The DPDPA includes provisions to protect children's data (under 18), ensuring parental consent for data processing and restricting targeted advertising aimed at children.

 

Global Social Media Regulations for Children

Several countries around the world have enacted or proposed restrictions on social media use by children. These efforts reflect the global concern about the negative impact of online platforms on young people’s mental and emotional health:

  • China: Implements strict age-based restrictions on internet usage, limiting screen time to between 40 minutes to two hours per day for minors and banning access from 10 PM to 6 AM.
  • European Union: Proposed legislation would require parental consent for children under 16 to access social media and impose stringent data privacy controls, setting a global standard for user data protection.
  • South Korea: In 2011, South Korea introduced the "Cinderella Law," banning children under 16 from gaming online between midnight and 6 AM to combat internet addiction. This law was abolished in 2021.
  • France: Children under 15 need parental authorization to access social media platforms. The country also ensures that earnings from children under 16 who engage in social media activities are protected from parental access.
  • United States: Although there are no blanket bans, some states and advocacy groups have called for stricter regulation of social media companies, especially concerning data collection and mental health risks for children.

 

Issues with Banning Social Media for Children

While the proposed ban on social media for children under 16 in Australia may help address some of the harms associated with these platforms, there are several challenges and concerns associated with such a move:

  • Enforcement Difficulties: Age restrictions on digital platforms are difficult to enforce. Children can often bypass these restrictions through fake profiles or by using older relatives’ accounts, undermining the intended purpose.
  • Parental Burden: Digital age restrictions place a significant burden on parents, particularly in areas where digital literacy is low. Many parents may find it challenging to monitor and manage their children's online activities effectively.
  • Freedom of Expression: Banning social media for children could restrict their ability to express themselves freely, access diverse perspectives, and engage with important social, educational, and cultural issues.
  • Benefits of Social Media: Social media also has its benefits. It provides opportunities for community support, learning, and self-expression, and keeps children informed about global issues and trends.

 

Way Forward: Balancing Regulation and Empowerment

To strike a balance between protecting children from the potential harms of social media and allowing them to benefit from its positive aspects, several steps can be taken:

  • Enhanced Age Verification Technologies: Governments and platforms could invest in more accurate age-verification tools to restrict access based on the user’s age, thus improving compliance with regulatory frameworks.
  • Parental Involvement and Digital Literacy Programs: Parents need better support and education to help them navigate the digital landscape. Digital literacy programs can empower parents to monitor their children's social media usage effectively.
  • Stricter Data Privacy and Content Moderation Policies: Platforms should be required to implement more robust data privacy measures for minors and enforce stricter content moderation practices to protect children from harmful or inappropriate content.
  • Integrated Digital Literacy in School Curricula: Schools can play an essential role in promoting safe and ethical use of social media. By integrating digital literacy into the curriculum, children can be taught how to navigate online spaces responsibly.
  • Emphasis on Mental Health Support: Governments and schools should invest in mental health programs to address the emotional and psychological impacts of social media use, providing support systems for children facing issues like cyberbullying or body image concerns.

 

Conclusion

  • The Australian government's proposal to ban social media access for children under 16 is a significant step in addressing the potential harms of online platforms.
  • However, this move must be carefully balanced with efforts to educate children and parents on digital literacy, enforceable regulations, and mental health support.
  • While the ban aims to protect young users from the negative impacts of social media, a comprehensive, multi-faceted approach will be needed to ensure that children can safely navigate the digital world while reaping its benefits.